summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/_posts
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPatrick Spek <p.spek@tyil.nl>2019-08-15 09:43:52 +0200
committerPatrick Spek <p.spek@tyil.nl>2019-08-15 09:43:52 +0200
commit8904b0bc21a4b69739056b3ef67c97424f86e791 (patch)
tree9cc21574c5af02b9c0b81ae716e0f6d42a40917b /_posts
parent7b29533a6bb0185f3fb6772c73ed6fbe08e2d3ae (diff)
Run aspell -c on SoC Controversy post
Diffstat (limited to '_posts')
-rw-r--r--_posts/2019-08-10-the-soc-controversy.html6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/_posts/2019-08-10-the-soc-controversy.html b/_posts/2019-08-10-the-soc-controversy.html
index b7b9dfd..2e6b82a 100644
--- a/_posts/2019-08-10-the-soc-controversy.html
+++ b/_posts/2019-08-10-the-soc-controversy.html
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ or "Standards of Conduct", for PerlCon 2019.
{% markdown %}
During his final announcements at the end of the conference, he noted that this
is still happening, even in person at the conference itself. This toxic
-behaviour towards him has made him decide to no longer involve himself in
+behavior towards him has made him decide to no longer involve himself in
organizing a conference for the Perl community. I personally think this is a
loss for everyone involved in the community, and one that was completely
avoidable by having humane discussion instead of going for Twitter harassment.
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ to *cause* harm, in stead of deter it? For this, I actually have clear
evidence, and the answer is a resounding **yes**. The harassment brought upon
Andrew was originally caused by an event that transpired at The Perl Conference
in Pittsburgh (2019). A video was removed, and a speaker harassed, for
-deadnaming someone. Until that event, I wasn't even aware of the term, but
+dead-naming someone. Until that event, I wasn't even aware of the term, but
apparently it's grounds for removal of your presentation from the conference
archives.
{% endmarkdown %}
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ from all sides pitching in with their opinion.
{% markdown %}
From my perspective, the people shouting the loudest in these discussions
aren't interested in making the world a better place where we can live in
-harmony, but to punish the offender for their behaviour. I don't think we
+harmony, but to punish the offender for their behavior. I don't think we
should strive towards punishment, but towards understanding, if anything. Just
being angry, shouting at people (either in real life, or over the Internet)
isn't going to solve any underlying problem. It is more likely to cause more