summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content/posts/2018/2018-08-15-the-perl-conference-in-glasgow.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPatrick Spek <p.spek@tyil.nl>2022-01-18 14:16:39 +0100
committerPatrick Spek <p.spek@tyil.nl>2022-01-18 14:16:39 +0100
commit6da0f9389c878259d636f565339841598d319c88 (patch)
tree0e873059e442cbba5dbcc2aa08d6335118edbcb8 /content/posts/2018/2018-08-15-the-perl-conference-in-glasgow.md
parente0141f47bd32acff8613db33bbf2414fd63939ed (diff)
Fix hugo blocks
Diffstat (limited to 'content/posts/2018/2018-08-15-the-perl-conference-in-glasgow.md')
-rw-r--r--content/posts/2018/2018-08-15-the-perl-conference-in-glasgow.md12
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/content/posts/2018/2018-08-15-the-perl-conference-in-glasgow.md b/content/posts/2018/2018-08-15-the-perl-conference-in-glasgow.md
index 0716bcc..060ed2a 100644
--- a/content/posts/2018/2018-08-15-the-perl-conference-in-glasgow.md
+++ b/content/posts/2018/2018-08-15-the-perl-conference-in-glasgow.md
@@ -13,14 +13,14 @@ I've attended a number of presentations there. On some of these, I have some
feedback or comments. These talks, and the feedback I have for them, are
detailed in this blog post.
-{< admonition title="note" >}
+{{< admonition title="note" >}}
The first talk I cover is not so much about Perl, but more about politics, as
the talk was mostly about the speaker's ideology. If this does not interest you,
I'd suggest you skip the [#discourse-without-drama](Discourse Without Drama)
section, and head straight to the
[#european-perl-mongers-organiser-s-forum-2018](European Perl Mongers
Organiser's Forum 2018).
-{< / admonition >}
+{{< / admonition >}}
## Discourse Without Drama
@@ -30,13 +30,13 @@ skeptical of such presentations from the get-go. Nonetheless, I did stay until
the end and tried to give it a fair shot. However, I cannot sit idle while she
tries to force her ideology on this community I care very deeply about.
-{< admonition title="note" >}
+{{< admonition title="note" >}}
I am not against the concept of diversity, I wholly support the idea of equal
opportunities. What I do not accept is the idea of equal outcome, or forced
diversity based on physical traits. This is what I refer to with "the diversity
ideology". I also don't think anyone has a right not to be offended, as this is
impossible to achieve in the real world.
-{< / admonition >}
+{{< / admonition >}}
One of the things that stood out to me is that the speaker tells us not to use
logical fallacies to condemn her ideology. This on itself I can easily agree
@@ -82,9 +82,9 @@ people for the sake of not offending anyone can effectively halt creativity and
the exchange of ideas. There was also an interesting quote written on one of
the walls of the venue:
-{< quote attribution="Oscar Romero" >}
+{{< quote attribution="Oscar Romero" >}}
Aspire not to have more, but to be more...
-{< / quote >}
+{{< / quote >}}
Don't try to add meaningless documents such as a code of conduct, which more
often than not hurts a community instead of improving it. Try to be a better