From 1e2320f4ecb42430e54e42e1981cb284a6d6405f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick Spek Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 07:50:16 +0200 Subject: Update desclaimer on "Hackerrank Solutions: Python 3 and Perl 6 (part 2)" --- ...10-11-hackerrank-solutions-python3-and-perl6-part-2.html | 13 +++++-------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to '_posts') diff --git a/_posts/2018-10-11-hackerrank-solutions-python3-and-perl6-part-2.html b/_posts/2018-10-11-hackerrank-solutions-python3-and-perl6-part-2.html index 5594bc2..26df2cb 100644 --- a/_posts/2018-10-11-hackerrank-solutions-python3-and-perl6-part-2.html +++ b/_posts/2018-10-11-hackerrank-solutions-python3-and-perl6-part-2.html @@ -27,14 +27,11 @@ Additional comments are always welcome as I try to improve the format. {% endmarkdown %} {% admonition_md Disclaimer %} -Due to some comments I had on the previous article, I want to make some -additional constraints I adhere to personally clear. - -I don't want to make use of `import` (or `use` for Perl 6) statements if these -were not provided in the challenge template themselves. I do this because I -want to stick to the challenges as closely as possible. Another reason is -because it would invite all sorts of discussion that I could've used any module -for it, and then discuss which module would've solved it best. +Once again I'd like to make clear I'm trying to stick to the original +Hackerrank challenges by not using any imports not specifically used in the +original challenge. If you have suggestions for Python 3 or Perl 6 modules to +make a given task easier, I still appreciate them, but I won't update my +solutions to use a module. {% endadmonition_md %} {% markdown %} -- cgit v1.1